W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [css-font-load-events] FPWD?

From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:50:39 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1D413590-78D3-4AAC-A3CA-5CE94775BC72@adobe.com>

On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> It has come to my attention that the Font Load Events spec has never
> reached FPWD.  I intended to do this immediately after our Fall f2f
> last year, as soon as I made John's requested edits, but it slipped my
> mind and then I forgot all about it.
> 
> So, can we go ahead and resolve on a FPWD like, right now?  We want to
> implement ASAP, but want to match it up with a CR, or at least LC,
> like usual.
> 
> I'd really like it if we can do a quick CfC before the next f2f, so I
> can set up a publication for, like, Tuesday.  I don't think this'll be
> controversial, since everyone seemed pretty okay with the spec last
> time it was presented, and John is pretty happy with the current state
> of the spec too.  (We've been conversing privately and making a few
> other tweaks as necessary.)
> 
> I'd then like to give a few weeks to a month for review, filling in
> whatever final holes are discovered in the spec, and then request an
> LC in March.  John is pinging relevant people at Moz to get reviews
> done ASAP as well, which I greatly appreciate.
> 
> What do y'all say?  FPWD CfC OMGWTFBBQ?
> 

Wait, what? Youíre asking for a FPWD *before* implementing? Thatís crazy talk. 

+1 to FPWD. 
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:51:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:51:10 UTC