W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Resolutions regarding fragments

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:36:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCzBbQrbRD0RsKudNdJZh4g=KWtRJUGL-Pxyh_6WHst-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
[please don't top-post http://wiki.csswg.org/tools/www-style]

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Did the WG consider using the terms 'content rectangle', 'padding rectangle', etc. for the problematic foursome?

It was suggested, but we didn't spend much time on thinking up names,
so no suggestion was seriously considered.

"* rectangle" might be a decent answer, except that it's not actually
a rectangle when border-radius/Shapes are in effect.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 02:37:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:18 UTC