W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

RE: [css-grid] Punt subgrids to level 2?

From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 20:34:19 +0100
Message-ID: <DUB404-EAS232D315E9D35AA0CB793ED3A5AA0@phx.gbl>
To: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "'www-style list'" <www-style@w3.org>, "'Julien Chaffraix'" <jchaffraix@google.com>
I was thinking about something like CSS Shapes L2 (ie: a spec that looks like a diff between the level 1 and the level 2)


± -----Message d'origine-----
± De : Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
± Envoyé : mardi 4 février 2014 20:15
± À : François REMY
± Cc : www-style list; Julien Chaffraix
± Objet : Re: [css-grid] Punt subgrids to level 2?
± 
± On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:55 AM, François REMY
± <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
± > ± Given that the rest of Grid's recent changes are minor tweaks that
± > will ± require only a tiny bit of implementation work before we're
± > ready to ship ± publicly, I'd like to ask to remove the subgrid
± > functionality from level 1 of the ± spec.
± >
± > As a person who supported the request for addition of this feature (by
± fantasai), I agree. It's a good feature the platform should have, but it's not a
± "level 1" feature aka a feature that the platform really needs in order to be
± useful.
± >
± > However, if the feature is to be dropped from the level 1, it would be good
± to get the level 2 started.
± 
± I'd shift the text into something else temporarily.  I find it's actually rather
± annoying working on two levels at the same time, at least until the lower
± level mostly stabilizes, because you have to maintain edits across the two or
± deal with them desyncing.
± 
± ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 19:34:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:18 UTC