- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:47:24 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org>, Blake Kaplan <mrbkap@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > A suggestion for ::shadow and ::shadow-all came out of discussing this on > IRC. Yeah, I think this is the best suggestion I've seen so far too. > In any case, please do not ship combinators, ignoring the request to use > named pseudo-elements instead, Anonymous combinators are better than crappy names - if all we could come up with is ::foo and ::bar, we'd absolutely go for the combinators . That said, I don't think we'll have any problem. > just because we don’t agree on names within > days’ notice. It's been about three months since I sent the update about this stuff: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0313.html>. It was mostly ignored, which isn't surprising, but the combinators were out there and publicly discussed months ago. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:48:12 UTC