Dear CSSWG, Blink is getting close to finally shipping Shadow DOM [1], and I would love to settle the recently renewed discussion around the exact naming of shadow-piercing combinators [2]. As indicated by Tab at the F2F, Blink currently implements the cat/hat combinators proposed by yours truly [3]. FWIW, I don't fully understand why it would be so terrible to leave cat and hat alone (in talking with Tab, there's only a weak precedent for preferring pseudo element functions to combinators with ::content), but I am okay with renaming them. Ultimately, it's this WG's shed, I just store my bike there. However, I would like to do this expeditiously (days, not weeks), so that Blink is able to ship with the new names. What is the proper way to do this? A phone call? A VC? How can I help moving this along? [1]: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/ay9tVGRa8Rg/GQpvRbrgflgJ [2]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0603.html [3]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JulSep/0454.html :DG<
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 20:27:36 UTC