W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: CSS 4

From: Shane Hudson <Shane@ShaneHudson.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 00:51:20 +0000
Message-ID: <CANYFvNOhw4=2Uqvu2hEc97utP3yTxt4wPLsdKv1bfjf5iav6vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>
Cc: W3C WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Hi Jens,
I would refrain from using the term CSS4 personally since all CSS modules
are now independently versioned. I'm not sure what the agreed consensus is,
but I tend to just say CSS and refer to the particular specification if it
is required. There are already many level 4 specs alongside the level 3
specs.

Hope that helps,
Shane


On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote:

> Hey guys--
>
> what does the group understand as "CSS 4"? Is this written down
> somewhere? Would it mean something like "all of CSS 3, plus anything
> marked 'CSS 4'," or would CSS 4 extend/duplicate all CSS 3 modules
> when times are right? Or, are there considerations to move over to a
> "living standard" model too, making "CSS 4" somewhat of an auxiliary
> concept only for module versioning and such?
>
> Sorry if I missed prior conversations, and thanks for clarifying!
>
> (By the way, apart from concrete understanding my aim is to learn
> enough to decide whether we need a "CSS 4" column in
> <http://meiert.com/en/indices/css-properties/> or not. If you have a
> view on that, please let me know.)
>
> Thanks!
>  Jens.
>
> --
> Jens O. Meiert
> http://meiert.com/en/
>
>


-- 

------------------------------

Shane Hudson (Website Developer -
www.ShaneHudson.net<http://www.shanehudson.net/>
)

07794746595

@ShaneHudson <https://twitter.com/#!/ShaneHudson> / +Shane
Hudson<https://plus.google.com/u/0/110111510059204475260>
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 00:52:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:18 UTC