- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:44:12 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:58:29 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I'm actually not sure where that ordering came from. I may have simply >> made it up, as it doesn't appear in MQ3. >> >> You're right that it doesn't affect any existing MQs, as they all have >> discrete values; any-pointer/hover are the first MQs to feature >> multiple values being true at once. I'm fine with changing it to be >> simpler. We can simplify your text further: >> >> "If it would be true for any values other than the number 0, a >> dimension with the value 0, or the keyword 'none', the media features >> evaluates to true. Otherwise, it evaluates to false." > > I introduced the ordering, and Tab introduced the MQs with non-discrete > values, and it looks like we did not consider the implications of each > other's edits. Now that we do have non-discrete values, I agree that the new > phrasing/behavior makes a lot more sense. All done. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2014 19:45:00 UTC