- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:26:58 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "hyatt@apple.com" <hyatt@apple.com>
On 04/29/2014 11:16 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2014, at 9:13 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> >>> On a related note, >>> # The middle image part is discarded (treated as fully transparent >>> # black) unless the fill-box keyword is present. >>> >>> This means that by default, the padding box of the element is >>> masked out (not shown). >>> >>> I think that's the opposite of the intended behavior. :) >>> By default, the middle part should be shown, not masked out. >> >> ‘fill’ is the initial value and usually the middle part of the image > allows the content to show through. Therefore, it won’t clip out the > middle part of the content. This is the current behavior in WebKit > and Blink. >> >> The question is if it is expected that the middle part of the >> content dose not show through if ‘fill’ is not specified. It >> might not be expected. After all, mask-box will usually be used >> to mask the edges of the element. >> >> I think it is better to change the behavior to not mask the >> middle of the content at all if ‘fill' is not specified. > > I changed the behavior as described above. No fill means no > clipping/masking of the middle part, fill means masking with > the middle piece of the mask box image. That sounds correct to me. Thanks! ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 04:27:26 UTC