- From: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:58:01 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "esprehn@gmail.com" <esprehn@gmail.com>
The spec[1] says the following for implied minimum size of flex items for the keyword of 'auto':
On a flex item whose overflow is _not_ visible...
This should probably read:
On a flex item whose overflow _is_ visible
In its current state this would result in any flex-item that is set to overflow: visible to have its min-width/min-height set to 0
This seems to be the opposite of what Elliot was wanting[2]:
# instead I think we should combine the behavior so the min-width is min-content unless your overflow
# property computes to a value other than visible in which case it should be 0.
The explanation to Elliot for resolving on this seems[3] to imply that the spec is aligning with IEs implementation so this seems to be a typo. Sorry we didn't catch this earlier.
Thanks,
Greg
[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#min-size-auto
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0538.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0463.html
Received on Friday, 25 April 2014 23:58:48 UTC