- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:05:55 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I missed that the comment #6 actually contains 3 feedbacks, so going through the other 2: >> 6. In "6.1. Hyphenation Control", the sentence: "The UA is therefore >> only required to automatically hyphenate text for which [...]" >> Is it the case that a UA is ever *required* to automatically hyphenate? > > I believe not. Not sure if the comment suggests re-wording, nor could I found good re-wording. If you think the text is misleading, could you suggest re-wording? If otherwise, I’ll consider this as closed. > > Perhaps this should be weakened to "Therefore, if no language is > > specified or no hyphenation resource is available to the UA for a > > specified language, the UA may choose to treat 'auto' as 'manual'." > > > > Section 6.1 also states, "Conditional hyphenation characters inside > > a word, if present, take priority over automatic resources when > > determining hyphenation opportunities within the word." Is this a > > strong-enough statement? We've seen many cases where a word will > > hyphenate one character away from a soft hyphen. > > Hm, interesting. I'll update the text to say that automatic hyphenation > points within the word are ignored when it contains ­ Fixed. > > 6.1 In example 8, there is an extra nun in نوشتنن, at the end. I > > think it should be نوشتن. > > Fixed. /koji
Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 10:06:30 UTC