- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:27:51 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/17/2014 05:17 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > > OK, but it seems odd to have a completely different value for > the shorthand than what shows up in the longhand. Given > 'background-repeat-x: repeat; background-repeat-y: no-repeat;', > I would expect the longhand to be 'background-repeat: repeat no-repeat' > for the way CSS normally works. Should we change the longhand > values too, and deprecate the old way? You mean the shorthand to be 'background-repeat: repeat no-repeat'? :) This is already valid. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 00:28:18 UTC