W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2014

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Telecon 2014-04-16

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:27:51 -0700
Message-ID: <53507187.5040402@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/17/2014 05:17 PM, Brad Kemper wrote:
>
> OK, but it seems odd to have a completely different value for
> the shorthand than what shows up in the longhand. Given
> 'background-repeat-x: repeat; background-repeat-y: no-repeat;',
> I would expect the longhand to be 'background-repeat: repeat no-repeat'
> for the way CSS normally works. Should we change the longhand
> values too, and deprecate the old way?

You mean the shorthand to be 'background-repeat: repeat no-repeat'? :)
This is already valid.

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 00:28:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:21 UTC