W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Styling of search/find-in-page results

From: Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 21:13:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKLmikMPU=hWU7w+ug2ND6nh8_X5xK-4v7HWTNgfLqW6FWfc_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>

Oh, then this means this is one more argument for the whole family of
related pseudo elements. :-)


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Currently it is not really possible to style search/find-in-page
>> results. Some browsers reuse selection style (Firefox), some browsers
>> have special style you cannot style with CSS (Chrome). I think a
>> pseudo-element selector should be provided to change background-color
>> and color properties.
>> Additionally, some browsers support highlighting all search results
>> (for example, in Chrome, when user selects to "highlight all"
>> matches). This might be another pseudo element?
>> The use case for this is in Mozilla pdf.js HTML5 PDF library and
>> viewer. It uses HTML5 canvas to render PDF5 content. But for the user
>> to be able to search and select text content of the PDF, a transparent
>> text layer is created above. If you search on the page, you get
>> results, but because text layer is transparent, instead of the result
>> only an empty colorful box is shown. See here:
>> http://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/web/viewer.html
>> (Use browser search and not interface which overrides ctrl-f keyboard
>> shortcut, this is the topic of another my post to whatwg mailing list:
>> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2014-February/042100.html)
> Unfortunately, the definition of such a thing would be essentially
> identical to ::selection, which we haven't yet actually specified
> either.  (We tried to in the past, but everyone implemented something
> observably different, and we haven't taken the time to figure out what
> the best solution is yet.)
> I think this use-case is valuable, but we need to do more than just
> define a variant of ::selection, because ::selection isn't defined
> yet. :/
> ~TJ

Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 04:14:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:21 UTC