On Sep 11, 2013 10:04 AM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2013 15:56 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> I like the idea, but matches has been in release builds for a long time,
>>> right? Hitch uses it.
>>
>>
>> <!DOCTYPE html>.<script>w("matches" in document.body)</script>
>> http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/
>>
>> false in both Firefox and Chrome.
>
>
> See http://caniuse.com/#search=matches. You do get mozMatchesSelector
(and variants) in there.
>
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Yes, to be clear, that is what i meant. If it is in a draft and
widely/compatibly implemented and deployed in released browsers not behind
a flag - people are using it. That's part of why we switched the general
philosophy right? No doubt one can be a shorthand for the better approach
though...right?
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:50:29 UTC