On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:05 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> I'm a little worried that there might be overlap between the CSS
> property names and the non-CSS-property-name values ('scroll' or
> 'scrolling'). That could be avoided by adding a functional syntax
> around the CSS property names, but that might be overengineering.
>
Yes, I think so.
We could call the scroll value "scroll-position". If we ever add a
"scroll-position" CSS property that doesn't set the actual scroll position,
we deserve what we get.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp
waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2013 01:23:51 UTC