W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 01:24:27 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLatB9qLG75o-LfLXJDh8VObrB6M_z4LFnYS66O48MOtMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>
Cc: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
I think we should match the syntax of 'transition-property':
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transitions/#transition-property-property
This means that any list of comma-separated IDENTs is accepted as a valid
value. This is important since it means if the list contains property names
the UA currently doesn't support, the value is still valid and the UA can
still optimize for the property names it does support.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Friday, 29 November 2013 12:24:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 29 November 2013 12:24:54 UTC