- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 13:31:17 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2013 20:21:16 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hmm, using bare strings as the media query name is interesting. It's
>> definitely unambiguous and non-colliding, and means that authors can
>> give whatever they want as the name without having to worry about
>> escaping. Plus, nice and short. +1.
>
>
> And as the syntax error recovery in media queries was well though out,
> this works fine in old browsers.
>
> @media (min-width:300px), ("huge") { ... }
>
> The custom query never matches, but only the custom part is discarded,
> not the whole @media rule. Most syntax extensions we could consider
> for media queries have this property, so this isn't unique about
> this specific proposal, but it is always a good thing to have.
Yes, I'm very glad we got MQs right.
~TJ
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 20:32:08 UTC