W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [cssom] Rationale for including (or not) CSSCharsetRule

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:17:39 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dHi=9YXh_VWsRj+d2zfmG8HqTTKo4nO1kH0v2tcj=TCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
I did so after reviewing current implementations, and finding a global
binding for CSSCharsetRule as well as finding members for
CSSRule.CHARSET_RULE. There seemed to be no reason to gratuitously break
compatibility with DOM-2 Style by removing this.


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> Hi Glenn and Anne
>
> In http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~**checkout~/csswg/cssom/Attic/**
> Overview.html?rev=1.166;**content-type=text%2Fhtml#**history<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/csswg/cssom/Attic/Overview.html?rev=1.166;content-type=text%2Fhtml#history>CSSCharsetRule was obsoleted because it was "not deemed necessary".
>
> In https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/**rev/961ed47ad0fc<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/961ed47ad0fc>it was restored by Glenn.
>
> I could not find any discussion about either of these decisions. If I
> missed it, please provide a pointer.
>
> Could both of you please elaborate on the rationale regarding
> CSSCharsetRule?
>
> If anyone else has opinions about CSSCharsetRule, please state them.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 14:18:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 28 May 2013 14:18:35 UTC