W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [css-syntax] <an+b> grammar

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 06:12:52 +0800
Message-ID: <32pf00shy38b0dltutv64h6j.1368569262000@email.android.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>


"Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> a écrit :
> I'll note, though, that this is now technically *slightly* more
permissive than the original grammar: if you use any of the "+n" forms, whitespace is now allowed between the "+" and the "n", while it
was illegal originally.  I couldn't wipe that out without abandoning property grammar entirely, since property grammar is entirely agnostic
to whitespace between tokens.


Why? Can't we have property-like grammars that are not agnostic to white space? It seems to me that we're gonna need this for calc(), @supports and Selectors at least.

(Other than this, this definition of an+b looks correct now.)

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 22:13:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 14 May 2013 22:13:35 UTC