Re: [css-syntax] <an+b> grammar

• From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:49:31 -0700
• To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
• Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCV4qv3P_duP=CTL4ptnLqNdgNo04E-XX74mJK3mpMhEA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:
> Hi TJ,
>
> I like your new approach for defining an+b, but I think that the grammar is missing a few clauses for when A is implicitly 1:
>
> n+3
> +n+3
> -n+3

Should be fixed now.  I had to add 8 more clauses to the production,
but they group naturally with the existing ones, so it should still be
easy enough to understand.

~TJ

Received on Monday, 13 May 2013 17:50:18 UTC