- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 15:23:43 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 09/05/2013 07:54, fantasai a écrit : > Flow-Relative Directions > ------------------------ > > TabAtkins: Want to see if Block-axis logical names proposal makes > people happy > <dbaron>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0265.html > TabAtkins: Proposal is to use 'start' and 'end' in both axes, and > when necessary to disambiguate, use e.g. 'block-start' / > 'inline-start', or 'row-start' / 'column-start'. > TabAtkins: Would also simplify spec text referring to start/before corner > dbaron: Would existing margin-start/margin-end prefixed implementations > become margin-inline-start/ margin-inline-end? > fantasai: Yes, and that gives you very useful shorthands margin-inline > and margin-block. Are the margin-(inline-)start and related properties specified somewhere? (In WG-space or not.) In particular, how do they cascade or otherwise interact with margin-top/right/bottom/left? Are they based on the direction/writing-mode properties like layout, or on document knowledge like the :dir() pseudo-class? > RESOLVED: Accept start/end proposal for both axes as described in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0265.html \o/ Cheers, -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 13:24:15 UTC