W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: [css4-background] use cases for 'border-corner-shape'?

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:10:08 -0700
Message-Id: <37B51428-4670-46B1-87AC-D5D902F72854@gmail.com>
Cc: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On Mar 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> On Sunday 2013-03-24 16:24 -0700, Brad Kemper wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I don't think there's enough
>>> demand to ask that it be put into CSS as its own feature, requiring
>>> substantial addition of implementation complexity (e.g., clipping
>>> regions of those shapes, etc.).
>> 
>> Do you expect to be implementing CSS Masking using
>> border-image-like syntax? (1) If so, isn't the new feature pretty
>> much just syntactic sugar for an internally created SVG
>> border-image and mask?
> 
> I don't think so, because it creates different author expectations
> of performance.  If authors use a masking feature, they're more
> likely to expect a substantial performance hit than for a border
> feature.  Then again, maybe authors should expect substantial
> performance hits for borders; they're often pretty slow.

Speaking for myself as an author, I didn't even know I was supposed to expect a substantial performance hit for masking. I learn something new every day, I guess (2 things for today, now that you've also told me general borders are already sometimes pretty slow). So, is the amount of effort to make a border shapes CSS feature more performant than the SVG masking feature part of the reason why you are reticent?
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 00:10:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:07 GMT