Re: [css4-background] border-corner-shape extension point?

True, but wouldn’t a rectangle be an even worse fallback?

Lea Verou
W3C developer relations
http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou






On Mar 24, 2013, at 22:46, Brad Kemper wrote:

> On Mar 24, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Today, I released [1] an app [2] which allows people to experiment with the upcoming border-corner-shape [3] property before it’s implemented in browsers, so we get timely feedback. One idea that James Padolsey suggested [4] was to allow people to define custom corner shapes, perhaps by cubic beziers. I think it’s a good idea, perhaps if we re-use the existing cubic-bezier() [5] notation from transitions and move it to css4-values as a new value type.
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> [1]: http://lea.verou.me/2013/03/preview-border-corner-shape-before-implementations/
>> [2]: http://leaverou.github.com/border-corner-shape
>> [3]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-background/#border-corner-shape
>> [4]: https://twitter.com/padolsey/status/315861268575694849
>> [5]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#single-transition-timing-function
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Lea Verou
>> W3C developer relations
>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou
> 
> 
> Thanks for creating that, Lea. For values like border-radius:50%, the fallback seems so very different from the 'scoop' shape that it doesn't seem appropriate. Maybe this should not be tied to border-radius, but just be a new property that overrides border-radius completely, providing both radius and shape together.