- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:19:07 -0400
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Cc: mikesamuel@gmail.com, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 13:07 +0800, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (13/03/23 9:35), Mike Samuel wrote: > > Is there an easy way to determine which w3 documents are relevant similar > > to the "Obsoletes" in RFCs? > > www.w3.org: old > dev.w3.org, dvcs.w3.org: new The documents on www.w3.org/TR are the current official ones. Look for "W3C Recommendation" in the title. Drafts on www.w3.org/TR link back to the "previous version" and also have a link to the latest version of that document on /TR so you can check. Documents on dev.w3.org or dvcs.w3.org may or may not represent the consensus of a Working Group, and are usually just working drafts not ready to be implemented. > I think only one or two of the documents in www.w3.org are "formally" > obsoleted, In that case they say so, right up at the front, in big letters. > but, you know, they are just old. No, documents are still being published on wwww3.org/TR every week. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ The barefoot typographer - http://www.fromoldbooks.org/~liam/
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2013 06:19:12 UTC