W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: The :min-width/:max-width pseudo-classes

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:42:38 -0400
Message-ID: <514C89FE.7000308@mit.edu>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/22/13 12:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>> Even this requires consumers who currently only say "hey, make styles up to
>> date" to instead give the list of elements they need styles up to date for.
> The "consumers" here are internal API, right?


> Hm, ok.  Well then, we should investigate the <iframe> behavior, and
> see if it's okay to duplicate, perhaps with my suggestion of an opt-in
> way to get the more expensive "true" value out of getComputedStyle.

So I just double-checked, and at first glance UAs now seem to do the 
right thing with <iframe> in general (though I can't quite tell why from 
code inspection...).

Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 16:43:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:09 UTC