Re: Unicode caseless matching details (was Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Tucson F2F 2013-02-05 Tue PM I: Fonts)

* Jonathan Kew wrote:
>IMO, we should -either- optimize for implementation simplicity and 
>efficiency (specify un-normalized C+S matching) -or- aim to match user 
>perceptions of equivalence (specify canonically-normalized C+F); but 
>un-normalized C+F falls squarely between the two stools, fulfilling 
>neither of the competing requirements.

(My impression is largely the same, though it would be useful to have
some information as to what the underlying platforms do for "native"
font identifiers, which I have not seen in this thread so far.)
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 15:42:38 UTC