W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Editing CSSOM and CSSOM View

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:26:39 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dBdXv1XEFch8OtgQdPELZHHZXi-92J8BFJruR5G=aqUw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Boris would also be a great addition as co-editor on either or both specs.
Boris, what say you?

G.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>wrote:

> (13/03/08 17:39), Simon Pieters wrote:
> > I'm considering the possibility of becoming an editor for CSSOM and
> > CSSOM View. I'd like to hear what the WG and the current editors think
> > of that.
>
> I am not an editor nor an active contributor of this spec but I noticed
> that Boris expressed interest[1] in editing these. This is somewhat
> exciting because I can imagine Boris bringing the level of rigor of the
> HTML spec to CSS, which are known to be quite vague in general. I know
> over-specifying stuff isn't a good thing, but I still don't know what's
> wrong in marking some of the arguable behaviors "undefined".
>
> That's just some personal thoughts here. Having multiple editors is
> certainly not a bad thing. Simon's specs are more rigorous than the
> average among CSS specs too.
>
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0472
>
>
> Cheers,
> Kenny
> --
> Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
> Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
>
>
Received on Sunday, 10 March 2013 14:27:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT