- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:05:31 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 01:02:39 +0100, Stu Cox <stuart.cox@gmail.com> wrote: > You say above that choice of primary input mechanisms is a subjective > choice for the UA vendors. However, the Pointer Events spec gives a > slightly more formal definition implying that *any* two input devices > connected would be primary; e.g. touch and mouse; I quote: > This suggests that [...] > > Or are these definitions unrelated? These two definitions are indeed unrelated, the two specs were written independently and without coordination. Based on your recent blog[1], I believe your understanding of what I meant is correct. Independently of whether you think this is the right approach (which is definitely worth discussing), if you think the current draft is hard to understand, I would definitely welcome suggestions for improving the wording. - Florian [1] http://www.stucox.com/blog/the-good-and-bad-of-level-4-media-queries/
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 16:00:57 UTC