W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [cssom][css-cascade] Access to specified or cascaded values in OM?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:39:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBEvR7Ee4-EYTvKBxGdSd-Z8LoT_UhWqf-uwSDFShK1qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 11:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:30 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>>> Do authors want access to cascaded values (sometimes empty, and with
>>> 'initial' and 'inherit' as they are) or specified values (with
>>> 'initial' and 'inherit' resolved and any empty values replaced with
>>> the inherited or initial value)?  I don't recall the use cases here
>>> to recall which is useful (one, both, or neither).
>>
>> I've posted a call for opinions on my blog: http://www.xanthir.com/b4Qi0
>
> You should cross-post to the CSSWG blog. Things like this should go on
> the CSSWG blog, that's kindof what it's for.

Feel free to do so.  ^_^

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 23:40:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 27 June 2013 23:40:36 UTC