*If* the spec is going to be changed to do logical truncation for non-scrollable elements (which is my primary goal), and *if* logical truncation is going to be specified to put the ellipsis where the first truncated character would have gone (which is not my primary goal), then I think that it would only make sense (and would be easier to implement) to give it the same style as that first truncated character, for which it is serving as a stand-in. At least it should be considered. But I am really not adamant about it. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin < > aharon@google.com> wrote: > >> I know, but the spec also seems to say to use visual truncation. In for a >> dime, in for a dollar :-) >> > > If you want that changed, then you should explain why. > > Rob > -- > Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni > le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa > stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, > 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp > waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * > * >
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 15:29:42 UTC