W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-cascade] Naming "value of a declaration", renaming "specified value"

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:36:18 -0700
Message-ID: <51CB2692.10607@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 06/25/2013 10:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Simon Sapin wrote:
>> This sounds good, but when doing the edits please add a note near the
>> definitions that explains the old terms, for people reading CSS 2.1 or
>> mailing list archives.
>
> Absolutely.
>
>> By the we, should we errata 2.1 for such editorial but fundamental changes?
>
> Yes.

It's imo ok to edit CSS2.1 to add the alternative term for "specified value",
but we definitely should not change or remove the definition of "specified value".
It's used all over in our specs.

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 17:36:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC