W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Compositing and Blending / canvas

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:27:12 -0700
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
CC: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0C947FF5-ADBC-4DD3-9FA5-D5002565AF8E@adobe.com>

On Jun 26, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com> wrote:

> The plan was to update the Canvas 2D spec so it refers to the compositing and blending spec for the list.
> This would be similar to how the spec currently refers to CSS color.

Do you want to specify the compositing model in CSS Blending as well and remove it from Canvas2D? I think the only confusing part is that the values for the same property 'globalCompositeOperation' are defined in different specs. Compositing still in Canvas2D and blending partly in Canvas2D and partly in CSS Compositing.

Greetings,
Dirk

> 
> Rik
> ________________________________________
> From: Daniel Glazman [daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:13 AM
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Cc: www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Compositing and Blending / canvas
> 
> Dear HTML WG,
> 
> The CSS WG's Compositing and Blending Level 1 spec (WD at this
> time) defines an extension to canvas [1]. We would like to ask
> for your review and feedback on how we should proceed here; on
> one hand, this extension clearly belongs to Blending but on
> another it could be better to have all canvas stuff defined in
> one single place, your documents. We don't have a strong opinion
> here, maybe the current situation is ok and we only need a few
> links.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/compositing/#canvascompositingandblending
> 
> </Daniel>
> --
> W3C CSS Working Group, Co-chair
> 
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 15:27:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC