W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Which browser's do support the sticky position?

From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:57:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKCAbMjs3wcPigV2W5HuqKXh_s3Kww6kAN5m5dGEKyRo6P_QhA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
Agree, but note that the Webkit implementation has some serious lacunae
that need addressing before standardization. The big one I know about is
that it doesn't work at all on <thead> or <tr>, which constitute at least
50% of the use cases.

zw

On Tuesday, June 25, 2013, Jon Rimmer wrote:

> I think the delay on speccing and implementing this cross-browser is
> unfortunate. It addresses a common use-case that is usually handled
> via jank-causing scroll handlers and has been received very positively
> by developers. The fact that it is only available, prefixed, in Webkit
> is likely to result in more mobile content that only fully works in
> iOS.
>
> On 23 June 2013 14:55, irfan mir <theirf@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Right now it is supported when you enable experimental WebKit in
> > chrome://flags in chrome and chrome canary.
> >
> > On Jun 23, 2013 8:15 AM, "Behrang Saeedzadeh" <behrangsa@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've seen this mentioned in many places:
> >>
> >> position: -webkit-sticky; position: -moz-sticky; position: -ms-sticky;
> >> position: -o-sticky; position: sticky;
> >>
> >> But does any other browser, apart from WebKit based browsers, support
> it?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Behrang Saeedzadeh
> >> http://www.behrang.org
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 12:57:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC