W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-cascade] Naming "value of a declaration", renaming "specified value"

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:14:19 -0700
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130624231419.GA22790@crum.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2013-06-24 15:45 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> If we don't have a publicly-exposed term, then every single spec that
> wants to define computed values has to handle the cases where there is
> no value, or the value is a global keyword.  That's not acceptable,

OK -- that's a good reason to keep a term.

I think we should consider more carefully which terms we want to
expose to the CSSOM, though, rather than exposing everything that
there happens to be a term for.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 23:14:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC