W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-display]? Compositing, expensive things, and laziness

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:44:16 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLb1Zhd-3h5p73wmnXpYRq8Qpx+SXAH8h5Q7agvZP60QMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Mandatory bikeshed: "display-optionality" is a horrible name :-)

I would prefer an approach that can't lead to content breaking in the
absence of support for this property. Content waiting for the
optionalElementRendered event could break. Can this be fixed?

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le
atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm
aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt
wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 02:44:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC