W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-backgrounds] Painting area and 'background-attachment: local'

From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:45:17 -0400
Cc: www-style@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Message-Id: <35CE80E9-1C51-42E4-A213-9E120D78C18C@w3.org>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:57, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:
>  Note: This means that 'background-clip: border-box' is indistinguishable from 'padding-box'.

I think thatís inconsistent with the rest of the background-attachment values and unexpected. There are ways to implement background-clip: border-box; to work with background-attachment: local; so I don't see why to give up on it. Sure, the behavior would be somewhat weird, but same goes for the combination of many properties, yet we don't disallow it.
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 18:45:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 June 2013 18:45:29 UTC