- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:22:23 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Le 19/06/2013 11:17, Simon Sapin a écrit : >> 1. Both the positioning and painting area are based on the scrolled >> content. (The difference between padding-box and border-box includes any >> non-overlay scrollbars in addition to borders.) > This is the part I find more important. In particular, the portion of > the image that is clipped by 'background-clip: content-box' compared to > 'padding-box' can scroll out of view > > As an example, these two document should behave roughly the same when > scrolling: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jun/att-0075/background-attachment-local-painting-area-test.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jun/att-0075/background-attachment-local-painting-area-ref.html Here is the behavior that the first document should *not* have: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jun/att-0076/painting-area-notref.html -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 10:22:43 UTC