W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-images] Intent to implement object-fit and object-position in Blink

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:18:21 -0700
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-id: <A234DDD8-F4E8-40CE-85FB-9E7C92C81526@me.com>
To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
I would certainly be happy to see progress on the WebKit implementation, and would hope that much of it could be shared with Blink.

Simon

On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:21 am, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> wrote:

> Any feedback? Apple? Microsoft? Mozilla?
> 
> Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> writes:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I'm considering implementing object-fit [1] and object-position [2] in
>> Blink, and would like to hear other vendors' opinions on supporting
>> these properties, most importantly to figure out if anyone is negative,
>> but also to learn about any plans to implement them. As far as I know,
>> these properties are currently only supported in Presto, where it's -o-
>> prefixed, and it's also using an older version (working draft or even
>> editor's draft - not sure) of the spec. The spec has reached CR by now,
>> though.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-images-20120417/#the-object-fit
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/#the-object-position
>> 
>> What I've found:
>> 
>> Apple: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52040 (object-fit only),
>> stuck in code review and Mac testing.
>> 
>> Microsoft: No info.
>> 
>> Mozilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624647 (object-fit
>> only), no progress.
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 15:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC