W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Dropping nav-* properties?

From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:59:18 +0100
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.wyg5k4sf6ugkrk@giuseppep-x220>
Hi all,
while my request below for feedback and clarification went unanswered, I  
see that the group went ahead and decided to drop the nav-* properties [1].

AFAIK all the issues mentioned in the various threads are about nav-index.  
But as result all nav-* properties were dropped. Can you help me  
understand why? Are there any issues specific of the  
nav-up/down/left/right? If so, could you point me to that?

As mentioned before, the nav-up/down/left/right (but NOT nav-index)  
properties are currently actively used in the TV space, and referenced by  
public standards based on Web Standards. Note also that:

1. they are used as a way to handle navigation done with a standard remote  
control (so not keyboard tab navigation)
2. they are implemented in TVs using Webkit as well as Opera/Presto based  
TVs.

Would be good to understand if there is any part of the spec that is NOT  
broken and can be kept in, to avoid forcing other groups to have to  
reference an old CSS drafts  (practice that W3C usually try to discourage)

Thanks,

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0428.html

/g

On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:17:12 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>  
wrote:

> Hi Tantek,
> I've just read your mail exchange with my colleague Mike [1][2][3] and I  
> wanted to add few comments on that thread as well as extend the  
> discussion to the Web&TV IG, as there could be other people that may  
> have an opinion on this subject.
>
> In short, the CSS Basic UI spec [4] mark nav-* properties as at risk,  
> and you seem to agree they should be dropped.
>
> As already mentioned by Mike in [1] and [3] , we (Opera) do recommend  
> use of nav-* properties for our TV store Apps, and AFAIK so far we  
> haven't received any complaint (this doesn't mean there are no issues of  
> course, but at least we haven't heard of any)
>
> Furthermore, as also mentioned by Mike, there are other specifications  
> referencing CSS nav-* properties, namely HbbTV [5].
>
> The HbbTV specification, although not aimed to the "Open Web", it's  
> still a public specification and is currently supported in Europe by  
> many retail devices (mostly TVs and STBs), not only Opera based but also  
> Webkit based
>
> Also in this case, I haven't heard (so far) any complaint from (Hbb)TV  
> apps developers.
>
> Given the pointers above, can you help me (us) understand what is the  
> problem with css nav-* properties and why you want to drop them? As they  
> seem to be used and supported by different browsers, would be possible  
> to investigate more in details what is working (and what is not) and  
> maybe drop only the problematic parts (if any)?
>
> I appreciate you may have debated this at length before on the www-style  
> list, but I was wondering if for the benefit of the web&tv folks you  
> could summarize the issues and provide related pointers.
>
> Also note that personally I haven't done an in depth analysis of the  
> spec and/or the implementations out there, but I wanted to get this  
> discussion started ASAP as the deadline for comments is already passed.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Feb/0027.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Feb/0036.html
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Feb/0037.html
> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ui/
> [5] http://hbbtv.org/pages/about_hbbtv/specification.php
>
>
>


-- 
Giuseppe Pascale
Product Manager TV & Connected Devices
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 17:59:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC