W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-masking] 'mask: none' clear all masking operations

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:45:56 -0700
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F52A8F9C-0934-4BCF-9C5E-04CDD1531266@adobe.com>

On Jun 9, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:

> 'mask' corresponds to 'background' and 'mask-box-image' corresponds to 'border-image'. 'background:none' doesn't clear 'border-image', so I think it would be inconsistent to make 'mask:none' clear 'mask-box-image'.

Yes, I agree and would prefer keeping this behavior. However, the argument of fantasai seems valid as well. Since all longhand properties start with mask-, you may want to disable all at once. 'mask' in the proposal earlier in this thread would not belong to the one shorthand nor to the other. It would be another shorthand that can disable all masking all together, but would also just support SVG masking. WebKit's Masking could then be accessed with mask-layer and mask-box-image.

Greetings,
Dirk


> 
> Rob
> -- 
> qqIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 16:46:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC