- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:50:07 +0900
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:53 PM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > fantasai wrote: >> # Feature value blocks are treated similar to at-rules, >> # they consist of everything up to the next block or >> # semi-colon, whichever comes first. >> >> This makes no sense. It *is* an at-rule, it isn't treated >> similar to one. > > Sorry but I disagree here, these value definitions take the form of > @-rules but they are not @-rules. Other @-rules have a defined set of > descriptors, these do not, I want to be careful to distinguish the > two. It's a simple use of terminology I think that helps prevent > confusion with other "real" @-rules. At a syntax level, they are > roughly equivalent but not entirely so (e.g. user-defined "descriptors" that > are case sensitive). At a syntax level, or rather a Syntax level, they're at-rules, end of story. There's no reason to distinguish them from "real" at-rules, because there's no such distinction - at-rules have all sorts of crazy rules for what can be put inside of them. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 13:50:54 UTC