- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:51:28 -0400
- To: "Rebecca Hauck" <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-style mailing list" <www-style@w3.org>
Le Lun 29 juillet 2013 20:28, Rebecca Hauck a écrit : > Hi, > >>From last week's telecon, ACTION-571 [1] - > > I've assessed the work that needs to be done in the test suites to get > ready for republishing. There are approximately 240 existing tests for the > 22 items listed in the errata. With some advanced searching in Shepherd, > I was able to identify which have no tests and which have pertinent tests > that may (need to be) modified to accurately reflect the new language in > the spec. Details all on the wiki [2] - see "CSS 2.1 Errata." Note that > the Shepherd queries there are filtered within each spec section to be as > relevant possible to the changes described in the errata and in the > corresponding minutes. > > Please let me know if you are familiar with any of these items and have > time to review or write tests associated with them. I've not gone through > this process before, so I'd be interested to hear how the work required > has been assigned and completed in the past. I wish I could help here. > Just as a data point, and as > a logical start to addressing these, I added names of people who proposed > the change and who are listed as Owners of the tests. > > I'm happy to manage and track this process and will use this wiki & > Shepherd to do so. I'd like continue this discussion at the upcoming > telecon to solicit help from WG members on these items. > > Let me know if I missed anything or if you have questions. > > Cheers, > -Rebecca Rebecca, I submitted this test http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/anonymous-table-box-width-001.htm which is based on: Issue 172: table-caption content overflows http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-172 [CSS21] table-caption width http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0186.html and such test has *not* been reviewed or approved yet: http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/anonymous-table-box-width-001/name/anonymous-table-box-width-001/ and the CSS2.1 spec has not been formally clarified yet. The Errata http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html makes no mention of issue 172 or of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0186.html ------- Overall, the Errata http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607-errata.html often seems to me to be precise editorial tuning. On the other hand, some spec-related issues I brought, backed up by tests, are still not addressed in such errata. Eg [CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0093.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0094.html list 9 non-reviewed-yet tests. Gérard > [1] https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/571 > [2] http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1 CSS 2.1 Errata http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1#css-21-errata -- CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 01:52:01 UTC