- From: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 23:12:21 +0000
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Stearns [mailto:stearns@adobe.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:13 PM > > If we can add 'block-level elements' to the applies to line for shape-outside, > with a description of what this means (it applies but does nothing if the > element is not an exclusion or float, but if the element is an exclusion it > defines the exclusion area) - all without adding a normative dependency - > then I'm OK with the change. > I don't see why "applies to: block-level-blocks" will make a normative reference to exclusions. You may not see the effect of a shape when applied to an element that is not a type of exclusion but that will be true if you don't implement floats. It is true that the two features are compliments of each other in many cases (to see a shape it has to be an exclusion or to change the shape of an exclusion you need shapes etc.) but I don't see the applicability of shapes as a tie to exclusions. Even less a normative one. Thanks, Rossen
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 23:13:38 UTC