W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css-display]? Compositing, expensive things, and laziness

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:08:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDC7BV65YCKRhUUZNaEEq9tgH7aUMHEZL70GptV3Yi9gBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
>> wrote:
>>> Mandatory bikeshed: "display-optionality" is a horrible name :-)
>>
>> I agree that it's somewhat awkward-sounding; suggestions for better names
>> welcome :-)
>
> visibility: optional?

Yeah, I think this is a good route, since 'visibility' already
controls the display without affecting geometry.

> I'm still not convinced this is useful enough to be worth implementing, but
> I think you should go ahead if you need to.

Cool.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:09:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:09:14 UTC