W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Tokyo F2F 2013-06-07 PM III: Reversing Transitions, Parens and Escapes, Alignment

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 11:55:16 +0100
Message-ID: <51D40314.30109@exyr.org>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 03/07/2013 06:57, fantasai a écrit :
> Parens and Escapes
> ------------------
>     - RESOLVED: MQ requires white-space on both sides of a parenthesis

I believe that this is an incorrect summary of the change we discussed.

The change is rather to require whitespace on both sides of the 'and' 
keyword (and 'or', when and if we add it) when that would separate form 
the "outside" of a parenthesis. That is:

     ) and

     and (

Note that 'and(', being a FUNCTION token, was already invalid. But using 
S+ rather than S* in the grammar avoids incorrectly suggesting that it 
is valid. This change only affects 'and/**/(', as well as ')and' for 

This is the same change that was resolved on 2012-12-19 for @supports:

Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:55:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC