W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css3-fonts][cssom] CSSFontFeatureValuesRule vs. CSSKeyframesRule

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:26:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDB7oWJ2Z5XAWiu55gzf55H4XWVyuWVXwXxZ-2CQoiyWag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> Cameron McCormack:
>>> I don't think we need the custom versions of has, set and delete.  The
>>> default versions of these should be fine.
>
>
> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>
>> You don't even need to define get(), do you?  The default operation of
>> that (defined in terms of the map entries) should be sufficient.
>
>
> I mistyped; meant to say that you don't need get, has and delete, but will
> need get if you are doing some checking of feature names/values.

Heh, another mistype.  s/but will need get/but will need set/

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 03:27:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 3 July 2013 03:27:29 UTC