Re: [css3-syntax] Separation of concerns: "declaration/rule-filled", "can be made important"

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote:
> Le 30/01/2013 05:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>> I've now done this.  The Parser intro says that the parser must be
>> provided with a list of "recognized at-rules", which contains whether
>> the names of at-rules and whether they're rule-filled,
>> declaration-filled, or neither.
>
> Should we have a less contextual name for "neither"? I just named an
> enumerator NotFilled in an implementation, but I don’t like it.

If you'd like one, I suggest "statement" or "statement at-rule".

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 09:44:41 UTC