W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2013

Re: [css3-syntax] Escaping U, R or L in url() tokens

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:51:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAr2ZdEVho=7zd2pf9DQ_8XE4zn3cJt6ZCtkVWi4yYZjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Blah, accidentally skipped the list with this.
On Jan 4, 2013 10:41 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote:
> > Le 04/01/2013 17:33, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
> >> Have you tested unicode-range? I'm interested in seeing if the u, the +,
> >> the -, or the ? can be escaped. I'll test in a few minutes if you
> haven't.
> >
> > No I haven’t. I included it in the patch because it looked easy and
> nicely
> > consistent, but it can easily be split out.
> >
> > I have no idea if implementations allow escaping of -+? but I somewhat
> feel
> > they they shouldn’t. We don’t do that for @ in at-rules or ( in
> functions,
> > after all.
>
> It looks like only WebKit and Firefox honor unicode-range at all.
> Both of them treat an escaped U in the token as an error.  So, I'm
> leaving that as it is, only accepting a literal u or U.
>
> I've made the changes to the url token, though.
>
> ~TJ
>
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 23:52:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:04 GMT