W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css3-page] comments on last ED

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:15:48 +0100
Message-ID: <20773.55220.710756.544811@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Daniel Glazman:

 >    Not sure the page and page counters' definition in section 7.1
 >    should not belong to the GCPM spec.

Double negatives makes parsing harder. But I do not think we should
move page counters to GCPM, if that's what you are proposing. It seems
we have intereoperability in three shipping implementations:

  http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters.html
  http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters-antennahouse.pdf
  http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters-prince.pdf
  http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters-weasyprint.pdf

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 08:16:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT