W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css3-page] comments on last ED

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:46:17 -0800
Message-ID: <51256E59.90804@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/20/2013 05:55 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
>
> The CSS WG is not responsible if vendors implement unstabilized features
> and if users of these vendors use the features. It says nothing about
> the quality of the solution they're using. It only says they use it.
> Good for YesLogic and AntennaHouse who shipped experimental features
> to the masses, bad for the W3C Process, something you should care about,
> right?

CSS3 Page went to CR already. We pulled it back because so much of it
was poorly-defined, and the definitions thus need several rounds of
edits before we get them right. But the features themselves have not
changed much in design from the CR.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:46:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT