W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css3-page] comments on last ED

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:46:17 -0800
Message-ID: <51256E59.90804@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/20/2013 05:55 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> The CSS WG is not responsible if vendors implement unstabilized features
> and if users of these vendors use the features. It says nothing about
> the quality of the solution they're using. It only says they use it.
> Good for YesLogic and AntennaHouse who shipped experimental features
> to the masses, bad for the W3C Process, something you should care about,
> right?

CSS3 Page went to CR already. We pulled it back because so much of it
was poorly-defined, and the definitions thus need several rounds of
edits before we get them right. But the features themselves have not
changed much in design from the CR.

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:46:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:08 UTC