W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [css4-images] Add format() hints to image()

From: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:54:41 +0100
Message-ID: <51250DE1.4000607@henke37.cjb.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr. skriver:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 20 February 2013 04:37, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I think EPS is old-school so shouldn't be included. (PDF is much better)
>>>> The fact that it is executable code (Postscript is a programming
>>>> language
>>>> after all) should be enough to not include it as a supported format.
>>> This isn't a list of formats the browser must support, it's a list of
>>> formats the browser must indicate their level of support for.
>> I understand that. I'm saying that EPS should not be on the list because no
>> browser will ever support it.
> While I'm fine with leaving it off, as was said before, this isn't
> useful just for browsers.  Including formats that are useful for
> printing or other stuff is useful and zero-cost to other
> implementations (they'll just not have it on their list of recognized
> formats, so it'll be treated like any other unrecognized format).
> ~TJ

Using mime types makes this a noissue.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 17:55:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:08 UTC